TRENTON - With a majority arguing that the state pension system needs to get on better financial footing, the Senate tonight passed a package of state worker pension reforms by a vote of 30-8.
Sen. Stephen Sweeney of South Jersey introduced the controversial proposal in what he described as a bipartisan vein.
"I make my living as a union leader," Sweeney told the Senate chamber. "You can go out of business if you don't manage your funds properly. These are modest not major reforms."
The reforms raise the retirement age of future state workers from 60 to 62, and require future state workers to make a minimum of $7,500 to qualify for a state pension.
Republicans backed Sweeney with the exception of Sen. Bill Baroni (R-Mercer).
Sen. Minority Leader Thomas Kean (R-Union) thanked Senate President Richard Codey (D-Essex) for posting the bill and Budget Committee Chair Barbara Buono for getting it out of committee.
"I hope the conversation goes on, ona bipartisan basis," said Kean. "We have important work to do to make sure individuals are not gaming the system."
Senators Jim Whelan (D-Atlantic) and Kip Bateman (R-Somerset) noted that the reforms are necessary to help teachers and other state workers who put in at least 20 hours per week.
Sen. Leonard Lance (R-Hunterdon) said the pension fund began losing solvency 11 years ago when the Legislature borrowed $3 billion from the fund against a 8% rate of return that could not be sustained.
"We did not put money into the pension system for nine years," said Lance.
In voting against the reforms, Senate Presdient Pro Tempore Shirley Turner (D-Mercer) and Senator Ronald Rice (D-Essex) argued that the Legislature's mistake should not be corrected by now punishing part-time workers.
"This is a high income state," said Turner. "We are widening the gap between the rich and the poor. ...You cannot make those who sacrifice the most continue to make the sacrifice."
Having already passed the $32.9 billion state budget by a 45-34 vote, the Assembly is scheduled to consider the pension reform measures later this evening.
Following passage of a $3.9 billion schools construction plan, the Senate also signed off on the state budget by a vote of 23-16.
In a statement, Codey said, "This budget clearly reflects the reality of our fiscal situation. Much like millions of Americans across the country, we have to do more with less. This budget required a lot of painful decisions, decisions nobody really wants to make but that had to be done.
"The size of this year's budget reflects the will of the people who made it clear, in no uncertain terms, that they want their government to make cuts, much like many of them are being forced to do," added the senate president.
UPDATE at 11:28 p.m: The Star-Ledger reports that the Assembly also passed the pension reforms by a vote of 54-13, with 12 abstentions.
Both of New Jersey's Democratic Senators voted to keep Joe Lieberman as Chairman of the Senator Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs ... >
There's nothing more difficult to see than the history before your eyes. It sometimes takes generations to understand the significance of ... >
OK, he didn't say precisely that, but when the Chairman of the Budget Committee informs us that governmental spending is the key to prosperity, ... >
The Star Ledger got it right last April when it gave a thumb's-up to the NJN management plan to wean “the state's only public ... >
The sub prime mortgage melt down and its ensuing financial “crisis” has tested the mettle of all of us who believe in and support the free ... >
I am pleased to report the results from the first national poll conducted by Environmental Studies Program in the College of Arts and Sciences at ... >
To view a larger version of this cartoon, click here. >
The American patriot and the gracious war hero re-emerged Tuesday, oddly in defeat. Senator John McCain gave a moving concession speech, ... >
Whenever I get the chance to visit my parents in Florida when working a comedy gig down there, it’s like living in a “Seinfeld” episode. They ... >
In an election year driven by a hemorrhaging economy and an electorate hungry for an end to divisive politics, 7th Congressional District candidate ... >
A couple of weeks ago, my mother, Angelina Katz, did her second debate on behalf of Barack Obama. A debate? My mother? If you knew her, you’d be ... >
A press release on the official Union County web site admittedly made me snicker just a bit today because it brought back to mind something my late ... >
Roll Call
for the budget vote? Did Bill vote for it?
Party lines on budget...
Except in Assembly where it looks like 3 D's crossed over..unknown who yet.
Baroni Owned By the Unions
Bill Baroni has proved over and over again that he doesn't work for the voters. He works for the Union.
Bill Baroni who has an (R) next to his name, but votes like a (D), should really have an (U) next to his name.
Bill Baroni-(U)
Legislature Reform Measures
Reminds me of the way Hitler started.........
And Sweeney is well, just plain brain dead, like his constituents in Gloucester county a bunch of old worn out Dirt Farmers and walking Zombies better know as graduates of the New Jersey School system.
budget reform
I find it ironic for Sweeney to say he makes a living as a union leader. He may hold union office but he is no leader. A union leader has solidarity with all their union brothers and sisters. This man is only concerned with his political future. And by the way I thought he earned his living by doulble dipping as a senator and a freeholder. Does he double dip in the state pension plan too?
I wonder
"In voting against the reforms, Senate Presdient Pro Tempore Shirley Turner (D-Mercer) and Senator Ronald Rice (D-Essex) argued that the Legislature's mistake should not be corrected by now punishing part-time workers.
"This is a high income state," said Turner. "We are widening the gap between the rich and the poor. ...You cannot make those who sacrifice the most continue to make the sacrifice."
How many part time jobs do they currently have. I do like the Lance lays the balme for this entire mess at Whitman's and the GOP controlled Leg feet. At least he is going out with class. While I am always suspect of Sweeny and his Norcross connections I cant say that removing parttime workers and increasing the retirment age to 62 is a bad idea. I do not like that Whelan supports it so vigerously.