March 3, 2008 - 5:33pm
News

Labor euphoric over passage of paid family leave, while Lonegan fumes

When the state Senate passed paid family leave today by a vote of 22-16, AFL-CIO President Charles Wowkanech admitted he felt a particular sense of satisfaction after a hard, 12-year trudge.

"We're exhausted, but we're very happy," said Wowkanech, whose outfit numbers 1 million strong in New Jersey, and who remembers first trying to float the idea of paid family leave over a decade ago.

What the Senate passed today was a bill sponsored by Senate Majority Stephen Sweeney (D-Salem) and Sen. Barbara Buono (D-Middlesex) that enables employees to pay into a fund that would allow them to receive compensation while taking up to six weeks off from work to care for their own health or the health of a relative. According to the bill, "an amount not to exceed $25 million may be transferred from the state's temporary disability fund to the new account to support start-up costs." The program is designed to run on the monies employees pay into the funds, which averages $33 apiece annually.

Not everyone was as happy as Wowkanech, and those who fought the bill were downtrodden on Monday.

"I’m not surprised, but I’m disappointed that the most anti-business Legislature would pass this anti-business legislation at a time when we’re losing business and we’re losing jobs," said conservative activist Steve Lonegan, former mayor of Bogota and a likely GOP gubernatorial prospect in 2009, who fears the program will explode into another bloated and broken government offering.

Sen. Nia Gill (D-Essex) had been a hold-out. Labor groups, including the AFL-CIO and the Industiral Union Council, gnawed on her phone lines over the weekend in hopes that she would vote for the bill, which she did.

Senators Nicholas Scutari (D-Middlesex) and Paul Sarlo (D-Bergen) had also expressed some skepticsm over the bill but ended up voting in the affirmative today. Unconvinced that there are sufficient protections in the bill for businesses with fewer than ten employees, Sen. Ron Rice (D-Essex) abstained, as he said he would.

"The fact that he abstained and didn't drop any poison pill amendments was a victory in and of itself," Wowkanech said of Rice. The labor leader had hoped at the very least the Newark-based senator wouldn't tie up the bill on the floor, and when he didn't, Wowkanech said he felt gratified.

When he first embarked on labor's collective endeavor to pass some kind of paid faimly leave, Wowkanech had worked with then-Assemblywoman Shirley Turner, who was a prime sponsor of the legislation. Citing bad economic timing, Sen. Turner today voted against the bill and Wowkanech said only, "I'm disappointed."

Lonegan applauded Turner and Rice. "I respect Ron Rice and Shirl Turner because they took a strong stand on an issue the state just can’t afford right now," he said.

IUC President Ray SteverIUC President Ray SteverCelebrating with Wowkanech was fellow labor leader Ray Stever, president of the New Jersey State Industrial Union Council, which was part of a pro paid family leave coalition that included members from other union groups, faith-based organizations and others.

"It was the only way to counter the business machine that was making phone calls," said Stever. "The people just won today, through all the lies that business put out trying to scapegoat labor. They say they're trying to protect small business, but the materials they're using as propaganda - informing them they have to pay for it - are not true."

The bill will now travel to the General Assembly.

"We’re going to fight it," said Lonegan. "The Assembly’s up for re-election next year. This is going to be right on their doorstep. We could lose pharmaceutical jobs and telecommunications jobs over this. It's already terrible. This is no time to be expanding entitlement programs."

MAX PIZARRO is a PolitickerNJ.com Reporter and can be reached via email at max@politicsnj.com.

Comments

Hold on to Your Wallets!


Initial cost bill will be $33/person, or $66 per working couple.  But govenrment always underestimates and before you know it, this act will cost you hundreds of dollars annually.

Guess another ten thousand people are one step closer to leaving NJ.

The man who reads nothing at all is better educated than the man who reads nothing but newspapers. - Thomas Jefferson

03/03/08 6:36 pm

Only GOP vote: Baroni


Baroni's the Fifth Column within the Republican Party.  Time for the GOP to kick this traitor out.

03/03/08 7:50 pm

MORE ENTITLEMENT


We all have to bite the bullet when a family member is sick. It is not easy and many families have a hard ship.

 But another government program is not the answer!!

 NJ has enough government programs on the books already. Isn't that the reason we are broke?

 This is another example of politicians taking a sad and emtionally charged issued and using it for political gain.

People have responsablities to to help their families, not employers. No matter how hard we try the State  cannot make life's problems go away. The politicians in NJ only seem to ad to them.

The world is a hard place and we all have crosses to bear, but the State of NJ has moved another step to socialism and the public can't afford to be taxed any more as we all know.

Just another feel good piece of legislated payroll  tax designed to pit rich against poor in the next election cycle, voted yes today by 22 gutless politicians.

03/03/08 7:59 pm

Good points by PC.  It


Good points by PC. 

It will grow into a monster. 

Every stoner I went to high school with is foaming at the mouth right now.  Everyone with a friendly doctor is just tickled.  Someone take bets on the first case of someone on leave taking care of someone already dead.

Tougher still on businesses is the language in the bill that allows for intermitten leave, coming and going.

A $10,000.00 bridge toll for U-hall trucks is up next.

 Shallow in thought but compassionate these 22.  Is this the great experiment?

03/03/08 8:28 pm

Tough s**t Lonegan


You and your anti-family rhetoric got beat today and New Jersey is a better place for it. You will always be a fringe person in this State and by taking stands against Bills such as this you simply place  yourself further and further away from the taxpayers of this State.

THIS IS A GREAT DAY FOR NEW JERSEY!! 

03/03/08 8:31 pm

Angry win?


That is the problem with liberals like you in NJ, anyone who disagrees with them gets attacked.

I have news for you pal, I am in a labor Union and I am tired of being taxed by these phony politicians for money I work hard for just so the can throw a bone to cattle like you in the herd.

I had a sick relative for many years and lost alot of time. I didn't get paid and I wasn't expecting to get paid.

That is called making a descisionand taking responsability.

 That's the breaks! Life wasn't mean to be easy and I don't need the State of NJ to take care of my family. How did people get by in the past? Families helped each other and chipped in.

If you think Mayor Lonegan is all by himself , you keep drinking the cool aid with the rest of the Liberals in fantasy land. People are waking up in this State and are tired of being told how to think and what to think.

We already have Charity care, welfare, SSI, Rental asistance, Childrens Insurance, Disability, Unemployment, etc etc etc.

PEOPLE IN NJ ARE TIRED OF BEING SCAMMED OUT THEIR PAYCHECKS!!!

03/03/08 9:11 pm

Are you are martyr?


You were in a Union so you made a good salary. Many people are not unionized and they need a bill like this to help them out. You had it tough, and I am sorry that you did, but does that mean everyone else has to have it tough just because you did?

Don't be so bitter. This Bill will cost you next to nothing each week. Don't deny others what you could not have when you went through your tough times. 

As for Lonegan, he is a side show for those who enjoy his kind of act. But he is not a major player, even in his own Party. Follow him at your own risk.    

 

 

03/03/08 9:28 pm

Every business owner


in this state should pack up and leave to send a message to Trenton that enough is enough!

03/03/08 9:38 pm

Relocate, Outsource & Offshore Support Website


Wow!

A tech person I know is designing a multi-server website to assist New Jersey businesses in relocating to neighboring states, outsourcing labor to other states or overseas. In the past I was giving him a hard time for mentioning it, but now I can't. It will be on-line by the end of March to mid-April.

From what he says, it will be a very simple, "Yes, you can do it and I'll show you how" type of website. He said it will have all the steps needed to outsource or relocate a business, document links, estimators on how much money will be saved and links to various support sites and government pages that will actually show how the company can get federal funding for offshoring labor.

He says that the typical relocation to PA nets a 15% labor savings and Delaware is around 20-25%. What's more important is that if you move more than 50 miles away, 80% of the workforce either won't follow or will quit in less than 1 year. This does not include the monies saved by lower tax bases, lower cost per sq. ft of buildings and reduced administrative and regulatory burdens.

If outsourcing is your game, well that's even better. Russia is a 60-70% reduction and India is over 75% reduction in labor costs. 

Apparently, many companies are not aware of what is required or think that this task is too daunting. He says that the typical company can be relocated within 20-45 days from inception time. The ROI is generally less than 1 year.

03/03/08 9:43 pm

Stever's Quote


From union boss Stever:  "The people just won today, through all the lies that business put out trying to scapegoat labor. They say they're trying to protect small business, but the materials they're using as propaganda - informing them they have to pay for it - are not true."

Huh?  It's "not true" that people have to pay for this?  Who's going to pay for it then?  Why does this state continue to spend money it does not have?  Why do union leaders and political leaders in NJ think everything should be handed-out and underfunded?  When will they realize that nothing's free and that the only people who'll be left in this state in 10 years are the filthy rich (like Corzine) and the destitute?

The man who reads nothing at all is better educated than the man who reads nothing but newspapers. - Thomas Jefferson

03/03/08 10:05 pm

Checkout Bumtag Stickers


John Adler & Bill Baroni are in good company.

Soon they will have 20,000 bumper stickers distributed around their district from the bumtag site. Also, there are instant electronic downloads. That should be good for Adler's congressional run.

Also, as time allows, I will be contacting every company who 'contributed' to each of the NJ legislators. I'm sure they will be happy to find that the money that they 'contributed' for their candidates went to help increase their management and staffing costs. I wonder how fast the vote will be rammed through the Assembly?

This information is at:

http://www.elec.state.nj.us/ElecWeb/contribStandardSearch.aspx

03/03/08 10:44 pm

NJ 3rd Worst State Gov't


As our state continues to tax their way toward socialism, the Pew Center just released the results of a ranking of state governement that lists only 2 state governments as worse than our own in NJ.  Check it out:

http://www.pewcenteronthestates.org/uploadedFiles/Overall%20Performance.pdf

The man who reads nothing at all is better educated than the man who reads nothing but newspapers. - Thomas Jefferson

03/03/08 11:10 pm

Baroni ain't no Republican


   Those who say this costs next to nothing dont' realize that soon they'll be robbing our pay checks of hundreds of dollars in coming years for a redundant program that less than one percent of the population will ever qualify to benefit from.   And if anyone protests they'll be labeled anti-family.  The Federal Government is giving us free money because the economy is crap and here we have our NJlegislators taking straight from our paychecks to pay for some ultra liberal program that 10 people a year might benefit from.

You have to use all your sick and vaction days to get paid leave to begin with  and many  who take this leave will have no guarentee of getting their job back.   Hows' that month and a half off looking NOW?   Thanks for Nothing Sweeny! Rot in hell!

  

03/04/08 1:21 am

N.J. Leads, The Rest of the Nation Will Follow


After the fearmongering and rhetoric of catastrophe died down, one conclusion became abundantly clear: Paid Family Leave is a law that will result in better working conditions for New Jersey workers and puts the needs of workers ahead of business interests. The facts of the law are show how tame the actual bill is: Everyone pays into it, the employer only pays 2/3 the amount during the six-week leave, and the leave is only taken once vacation time has been exhausted.

In California, where the economy is perfectly fine despite the quasi-recession we're in, the sky hasn't fallen because of their paid family leave act (Incidentally, the majority of those in California [80%] who took advantage of the law were pregnant women who used that time to take care of their newborn babies). The studies references in the articles on this bill cite that it will help low-income workers disporportionately. Between a low-income worker who has to care for a sick relative in an emergency and a nameless corporation that gives very few benefits to their workers, I know what side I'm on. The bill's rights for workers should be the norm for all workers in every employer-employee situation and shouldn't be viewed as an aberration. Just as with the necessary death penalty abolishment and (hopefully) the upcoming marriage equality victory, this bill will set a precedent for other states to follow.

Get behind Workers Paid Leave, New Jersey, and make this bill into law pronto.

03/04/08 7:53 am

NJ: #1 Relocator, Outsourcer & Offshorer


Yep.

As New Jersey is leading the nation as the number one relocator, outsourcing and offshoring will soon follow. Transfer the labor portion to another state or country and all of these worries goes away. Once the labor portion goes, there's no benefit in keeping the corporate offices here either.

 

Business owners, ask yourself "What are the benefits of working in New Jersey?" and "How much grief and finances would I save if I went somewhere else?".

 

RELOCATE, OUTSOURCE & OFFSHORE - Save 25-75% on Labor, administration and office space. The act of doing this is extremely simple, it just takes the desire to say "What am I doing here, banging my head against the wall everyday? Nothing is going to change unless I make it change."

 

There's nothing left in New Jersey.

 

RELOCATE, OUTSOURCE & OFFSHORE

RELOCATE, OUTSOURCE & OFFSHORE

RELOCATE, OUTSOURCE & OFFSHORE

03/04/08 9:46 am

California Bust


Sorry, Martin, California is not doing as well as you claim.  They are facing upwards of a $16 Billion deficit this year.  That state is choking on endless populist ballot initiatives like paid family leave.  Costs not considered by the masses when they pull the yes lever for feel good proposals are consuming more and more of California's revenues annually.  It's unempoyment rate is almost 6% as well.  Welcome to European Socialism, New Jersey!   Look towards proposals mandating 4 day work weeks next and extreme taxes on overtime and bonuses as well. Not to mention unemployment rates like those of the E.U. --8 and 9%. Economic growth is not spawned by incentives to stay at home and when paid family leave flies through the Assembly in the next two weeks and barely lands on the Governor's desk long enough for him to sign it, remember his budget address promised no new taxes this year and he broke it not even a month after delivering it.  Long live NJ's wholesale descent into economic miserabilism!

03/04/08 8:44 am

We had 8 murderers on NJ


We had 8 murderers on NJ death row who killed and raped women and children and one of whom murdered again while in prison, thanks to endless appeals.  NJ voted for the death penalty but Corzine abolished it without allowing it on the ballet, scared NJ wouldn't vote the way he wanted. 

In Texas crime dropped 60% thanks to the death penalty  

I have no problem with marriage equality. That's the only liberal position I take.  The rest of what liberals want is rubbish.

03/04/08 9:18 am

Amazing


Why is it Republicans are always happy when businesses get handouts like new roads or tax breaks to come to the state, but when the people who are made of flesh and blood get something they have to pay for out of their own pocket it's a bad thing.

It's bizarre that artificial constructs like corporations matter more than human beings, especially when you talk as if you are the party of family values.

If your wife is in the hopsital after giving birth to a premature baby and there's no one else to help the family you shouldn't be able to take time off at half pay, half pay you purchased yourself with this insurance policy, to protect your family.

Instead your boss should be allowed to force you to come to work while your family collapses, or fire you so your family starves.

Family values my tukus.

03/04/08 9:39 am

FA


Labor has a right to ask or demand more benefits.

 

Just remember that in a global economy. You know the same one where you buy stuff at Target and Wal-Mart because it's cheaper, but it is of foreign content and puts americans out of work, yet you disclaim that because you need the money and say "It's not that much money." or "Look at what I'm saving!" or "Gee, I really NEED a new plasma TV."

 

Well, labor is cheaper in other countries or regions of this country. As the disparity between your total employee costs widen from those of other areas, sooner or later business can't ignore those costs differences. Remember, a company know exactly how much each employee costs to keep, to the penny. The buildings and governmental costs are also factored. After seeing the numbers, some exceeding 80% cost reductions, I can no longer be a protectionist. I am in favor of relocation, outsourcing and offshoring.

 

Business has the right to relocate, outsource or offshore just as you have the right to try and place more burdens on them. Perhaps when the jobs start drying up, employees will realize that they need a job before the benifits.

 

Don't complain when your job goes to New Delhi.

03/04/08 9:56 am

Euro Socialism...


It's funny you should mention European Socialism, aldomanuzio - there was a woman who testified before the Assembly Labor Committee who made the exact same comments.  She actually had stats to prop up her arguement, citing examples in Scandinavia where a similar program was instituted and is failing - but they were dismissed by the Committee.

At least some folks pay attention, even if Legislators don't.

While I think that Paid Family Leave is a great sounding idea and Senator Sweeney's heart is in the right place, this is uneeded.  It will only harm people in the long run as businesses look to other states to set up shop.

The Commerce Department stated that 40% of the population didn't have access to some kind of paid family leave -- but couldn't cite what part of that 40% were made up of students, part-time workers, seasonal workers, people with 2nd jobs, etc.  I'm sure if you included those figures, the number may have been considerably lower.  Another example of Legislators making an uninformed decision with incomplete information.

Business as usual in NJ.

Veritas vos Liberabit
"Collecting more taxes than absolutely necessary is legalized robbery." - Calvin Coolidge

03/04/08 10:00 am

It's just not pragmatic


I think employers can work with employees that have real trumatic family problems. I think thats how we've gotten by thus far. Paid leave  just puts employr and employee at odds with one another.  If someone uses all their vaction leave and sick time and still needs a month and a half off I'd say 9 times out of ten it won't be a legitmate need.  I  forsee people intending on quiting their job who get paid leave and never return to work.

03/04/08 11:23 am

Great day for all of the drug addicts


You must be very happy today, along with the rest of your family. 

"The only man who never makes a mistake is the man who never does anything."
                --Theodore Roosevelt--

03/04/08 11:59 am

New Jersey leads alright


Yeah, New Jersey leads, right down the toilet!   More jobs will be going out of this state, and the only people left will be the drug addicts, state employees and corrupt politicians. 

"The only man who never makes a mistake is the man who never does anything."
                --Theodore Roosevelt--

03/04/08 12:01 pm

COMCAST Must Feel Like A Chump By Now!


Well, If you check who Comcast, Verizon and many of the major political contributors gave to, they were the same one's who voted in the Paid Family Leave.

Boy, I bet they feel like chumps.

This info is available on the NJ election site and on the following link:

http://www.nj.com/news/bythenumbers/

03/04/08 12:10 pm

Titanic blunder


As our "leaders" rearrange the deck chairs on the Titanic, we should make it a priority to expand mass transportation service from PA to NJ to NYC in order that we the people can make our exodus across the mighty Delaware to the promised land.  I can't think of a better use of my tax dollars given that the ship of state is sinking fast.  Go west, young man! 

As far as Baroni goes, you've ensured a lifetime tenure in the State Senate in your legislative district by your vote.  Congratulations.  On the other hand, you will NEVER win state-wide office as a Republican.  Then again, life is a series of trade-offs. 

03/04/08 12:57 pm

Redistricting 2011


What would happen if Hamilton and Trenton ended up in the same legislative district?

03/04/08 1:29 pm

all i can say


Last thing i will say is that there's no way NJ voters would have voted themselves a payroll tax that goes up every year

03/04/08 2:34 pm

Another big spending spree


How does Corzine retain any sense of credibility on spending if he signs such an outrageous taxpayer ripoff?

How do you talk about "pain," cut more aid to suburban districts and municipalities so you can cough up more dollars for floundering cities and giveaway programs like paid leave?

What is the criteria for such a program? Who will monitor for fraud and abuse?

Why is Baroni supporting such nonsense? Another RINO who has delusions of grandeur in that acting like the new Bill Gormley will get him to the next level?

How many statewide and congressional races did Gormley lose?

Three?

Wake-up Bill. Voting with the opposition just show how weak you really are!

03/04/08 3:34 pm

Too Funny!


03/04/08 4:11 pm

FIRSTAMEND07, MARTIN


If this was such a great idea, why was it not made voluntary?  Why can't employees just contribute to a pre-paid joint insurance fund and collect when they took family leave?  Any why aren't businesses given the choice of whether to honor a voluntary program?  I mean, if its such a great idea and great for New Jersey, then why make it mandatory?

I'll tell you why:  because feel good lliberals like you love to tell the rest of us, through legislation, how to live our lives and how to spend our money.  It's legal extortion. 

 Well, with ratables going down in NJ, wealth flight combined with the recent layoffs at Squibb and other pharmaceuticals, we'll just give another reason for the state to continue to decline. 

 Businesses pay an unemployment insurance match for the conventional unemployment insurance fund.  their percentage match is determined by the state is correlated to the businesses payroll.  The percentage match is determined by several factors, including if employees of the company have taken benefits before (such as seasonal workers).  With this program in place, every time a person leaves under this new provision, the percentage businesses pay goes up.  So, please, don't tell me businesses won't pay.

03/04/08 4:28 pm

Hey Gang, Suck it up!


The Bill is going to become law so just get over it.

To the poster who keeps wanting to out source his businees . Fine, Go ahead , get your workers from New Delhi. New Jersey will survive and prosper without you.

To the anti-family crowd, . Sorry, but you are going to have to find another way to make people choose between their families and their employers demands.

New Jersey will continue to do well, with or without all you naysayers.

Finally, stop threatening to leave. Either make this State better or hit the road. Someone will take your place. New Jersey will alwasy be a good place to make money.  

P.S. Take the whining Lonegan with you.  

03/04/08 4:44 pm

Alwasy?


Is that a new word?

Gee, with all the tax dollars spent on public education you would think a nice guy like you could spell when you are bashing people who think for themselves.

By the way, I read all the postings and I didn't see an anti family quotes. Many of the posters feel this is bad legislation and there are existing programs like unemployment, SSI, etc.

Haven't you learned anything living in NJ?

 The government has mis managed every other feel good program in the past, Will this new one be any differant?

Most reasonable people would like to help out people with problems but right now the State needs to be fixed before we add another program for the crooks to dip into.

Why is it every time a angry liberal gets confronted they have to use melodramatics to prove the argument.

I will say it again ,

THE STATE CANNOT SOLVE ALL YOUR PROBLEMS!!

03/04/08 6:21 pm

Spell Check optional


Must have missed the " always" .  Believe it or not I am not a Liberal. Moderate, not liberal. This Bill, by the way,  was introduced by a moderate Democrat who battled the State Worker Unions to a draw. That is something the great Lonegan has never attempted to do.

I do believe that government has a role in helping people when it can. But not at the expense of others.

You see, that is where you anti-family paid family leave haters lose your argument. The Worker pays, the Worker takes the needed benefit only under certain circumstances, and the businees has an employee who is grateful and thankful. THERE IS NO TAX BEING IMPOSED ON THE BUSINESS OWNER. The paid leave time is very limited, only 6 weeks TOTAL.

It is time to stop crying. It is going to happen. It will be good for everyone. NOT ONE SINGLE BUSINESS WILL GO OUT OF BUSINESS BECAUSE OF THIS BILL.

I am in a hurry so can you pleasse speel chck my pst agin?

03/04/08 6:48 pm

FA doesn't get it.


FirstAmend says:  "I do believe that government has a role in helping people when it can. But not at the expense of others."

If "others" don't pay, who does?  Are they not going to start taking money out of my hard-earned paycheck?

"The man who reads nothing at all is better educated than the man who reads nothing but newspapers." - Thomas Jefferson

03/04/08 7:23 pm

firstamendment


First Amdment,  there are so many disqualifiers attached to paid family leave that few will ever take advantage of it. That is what Corzine and other state officals are banking on. 

It is insurance...  And how do insurence companies make money?  By limiting their number of claims!  The state government will making money off this scam called paid family leave and they can use it to fill gaps in the state buget and other such nonsense like paying for underfunded state pensions  which has nothing to do with helping families.

  And a huge segment of the population who work for small business, simply won't take it because they won't get their jobs back.  so no, it won't be good for everyone.  The government will rake in the the dough, and use the surplus from paid leave won't benefit anyone but the self serving state government. they sold you a feel good idea.  Do you still feel good, or do you feel a little like a sap?  

03/04/08 11:07 pm

Don't feel good, feel GREAT!


The Bill is a good Bill. Like every other law it must be enforced. The conservatives in this State have used the excuse of " abuse" too often. Sorry, but the whole State is not corrupt.

The difference between Conservatives and moderates is that you conservatives have given up on society and the American people. You think that everyone, except your own group, are corrupt. You have given up on the value systems of the family. Everything is negative. Us moderates are still willing to give the common man a chance .

This bill , like every other bill ever put into law, can be abused.

It is such a good bill and such a good idea, I will take my chance.

It is a shame however that so many of you have lost all faith in New Jersey and its citizens . 

03/05/08 6:37 am

FIRSTAMEND


You haven't answered my question:  If this is such a great idea, why not make it voluntary?  And why should I pay into a fund for a benefit I will never collect?

03/05/08 7:28 am

I've not lost faith in people


If it's so great let the people vote themselves a payroll tax then. If Lonegan is correct the disabilty trust fund was raided for 75 million and  was spent on things not related to helping disabled.   whose to say they won't do it again with paid family leave. They've already misused our tax dollars, First Amend.  Corzine had  stem cell reasearch centers built without voter approval  because he was so sure that his ballot initiative would pass.  I have faith in the people of NJ.  I would let them vote on things like the death penalty and tax scams but instead we get that shoved down our throat.  It's that arrogant bearded idiot and our liberal state legistlature that has no faith in the people of NJ.

03/05/08 7:33 am

PFL and its benefits redux


Panama: For the death penalty and other such matters, I'm not sure a ballot and initiative is the correct answer. Ballot and initiative, which costs millions to implement, as with the latest ones Schwarzenegger pushed through in Calif., would have meant that the majority of Americans would have voted against integrated schools in the 50s and 60s, and other terrible matters. Also, an argument that uses a slippery slope, "if x happens, then y," is not the most plausible one to make, since these are notoriously unreliable. When Paid Family Leave is implemented, businesses will not face unnecessary restrictions and would rather give workers what should be the norm: Basic rights to care for loved ones or themselves in the case of an emergency -- without the fear that their employer would use that against them and fire them. This is on the employee's dime, not the employer's, and provides only the most basic of rights. I would agree, however, that this needs to be implemented regionally -- in Pa., Del. and N.Y. -- for greater uniformity in employment standards.

And PoliticsSJ's (check your private messages, btw) response, that this should merely be voluntary for businesses, is rather naive. Many, but not all, businesses wouldn't have unions, worker rights, environmental standards or anything of the sort unless it was mandatory (hence, my strong belief in a system of checks and balances in the private sector, too). This is why, for example, we need tough emissions standards on polluting companies since these industries won't regulate themselves.

Having just read some studies on the California version of PFL (Paid Family Leave), I noted one UCLA economist found that those companies that already had PFL actually had saved money in the long run because of a) employee retention and satisfaction and b) saving money from training new employees.

03/05/08 11:21 am

Naive?


Martin:

It's is quite obvious you have never owned a business, you've never met a payroll, you've never created a job, paid payroll taxes, property taxes, inventory taxes, workers comp policies, liability insurances, property insurances, etc., etc.  And businesses have to pay a higher per kilowatt rate electric rates, higher internet rates and higher phone rates than residential customers.  So they have to pay more for the same service, just because they are a business.

I think the person who is naive is you.  Once you've been in a position to staff a business, provide the benefits, pay the overhead and attempt to maintain some semblence of profitability (which is getting much harder in NJ), then maybe you can speak intelligently on this subject. 

There is a difference between environmental standards and forcing businesses to provide a benefit:  lack of environmental standards can affect citizens not employed by the business.  The inner workings of a business, and its internal policies, are of no concern for the government, unless it involves gross negligence or discrimination. 

You are the one who believes its a great idea.  If it is, it should be voluntary.  But, just like any typical Democrat, you're great at spending other people's money. 

And, just for the record, the businesses will pay.  The rate businesses pay into the unemployment fund is determined by several factors, one of which is if employees have used the insurance fund. 

This will be another government hand out, and just like all the others, will be abused by workers and by politicians, who will see this as another pot of money to pay for expanding government.

03/05/08 1:08 pm

The liberals are the corrupt ones


The bill is nothing more than a socialist scheme to have government control individual's lives.  This is something that all of you communists love, tell everyone else what to do.  It has nothing to do with family, but everything to do with the liberals like yourself who take from hard working people to give to the drug addicts and lazy bums you think are your power base.

 

"The only man who never makes a mistake is the man who never does anything."
                --Theodore Roosevelt--

03/05/08 5:30 pm

The World is evil!


Why do you people even wake up each morning?

"Everyone is corrupt!"  "Everyone is going to cheat me!" " I can't benefit so no one else should!" " The government is killing my business!" " People should get into work and screw their families!"     " The communists are coming!"

If things and people are that bad around here then maybe you better pack up and find a better place to live. Maybe Mississippi or Oklahoma or some other " forward thinking " state.

But you know what I know? You complainers are all going to stay in New Jersey because you know that you can make money here.

ON MONDAY THE BILL WILL PASS THE ASSEMBLY APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE AND NEXT THURSDAY IT WILL PASS IN THE ASSEMBLY AND BE SIGNED BY THE GOVERNOR WITHIN A WEEK.

It is going to become law and ALL OF US,  even you whiners, will be better off for it.

So stop dragging the State down with your negativity.

Celebrate with the rest of us and embrace the fact that you can help your fellow citizen in a time of need.

03/05/08 9:57 pm

FA – Ineffectual and Boring


Don’t give yourself credit for this bill passing. You have nothing to do with this at all. You may gloat at the fact that this bill is being passed due to political payoffs and the weakness of our legislature, but you had nothing to do with it. There haven’t been too many supporting your position on this thread lately,  much like the Governor’s Toll Road Proposal. Perhaps the other union supporters of this bill have realized that maybe this bill has finally ‘jumped the shark’ and feel it’s wise to be quiet as there may be consequences to its actions?

 

Yes, business may be unable to stop this bill from going in, but a least we are trying to express the impact of this bill instead of blindly towing the state employee - AFSCME party line. Your job is protected for the moment, until new state administration comes into power. We know it won’t be Corzine, so you better pray that Codey gets in. However, in a couple years, based on the spiral this state's executive branch is in, that probably won’t happen.

 

We, the business owners will actually have the last laugh. Hopefully, we’ll be able to cause a good enough of a labor downturn that state cuts will be unavoidable. Layoffs and job freezes are in the future and what better than to blame it on a poor economy. I'm sure this bill's supporters won't admit that this bill had anything to do with an employment downturn. With a downturn comes lack of revenue for the state and a bigger deficit. Hopefully, your peasant job is low on the state's totem pole. I know you can’t be too high on the list due to your poor writing skills and limited scope of thought - definately a worker bee or a cockroach (they survive until being stepped on). Sooner or later the state axe is coming.

 

The thing that worries me is that, if most people who take this plan are pregnant workers, many employers might start screening the female workforce. Those women who are in childbearing age might feel the brunt of this bill, as they may be candidates for taking one or two events during their employment. But you’re not a women so why would you care? In a small shop, if there isn’t enough money in the company’s pool, the unemployment tax rate goes up for the employer to replenish the deficit. Also, they will loose the worker for periods at a time. This will actually be a direct assault on single or married younger women and those families you are 'trying' to protect – like it for not younger families and older families may take a direct hit. Business greedy or not – it comes down to the small employer feeding his family or someone else’s. Guess what? Someone else's looses every time. Bigger companies may absorb it or have an unwritten code that quietly looks for 'better skilled' employees.

 

In any event, write the date of this bills passage and mark it on next year’s calender. The "I told you so" is coming.  

 

Enjoy.

03/06/08 4:02 am

Anger =Stress


Relax, take a deep breath. Business owners will not try to destroy the economy just to make a point about Paid Family Leave. At least not responsible business owners. Business owners will not be " screening" pregnant women because of this bill.

Did you go out of business because we raised the minimum wage?

The overeacting brought on by your listening to the end of the world scenarios of Lonegan and Kirschner will only get you stressed out.

When the bill comes into effect no money will come out of your business. You might have to fill out an extra paper or so. You will survive as will your business. If you decide to " outsource" , see you later. But I know you are not outsourcing because of Paid Family Leave , so please stop that argument.

I had absolutely nothing to do with the passage of Paid Family Leave. But as a citizen who has the right to voice an opinion , and is guaranteed that right by the FIRST AMENDMENT, I must say that my voice and argument was heard . 

Just relax over this , Lonegan has you all fired up. Remember he is also nothing more than a politician, but in his case he is an unsuccessful politician.

Paid Family Leave is a dead issue. IT WILL HAPPEN!

So lets talk about state service cuts, taxes, and rebates...... 

03/06/08 6:34 am

Relaxed and Moving!


Yep! I’ve secured my office space in Pennsy. I’ll be relocated there in early May, once the office space is available. This is a done deal. I’m just working out a few final details. There appears to be only about 20 employees following me. I’m still living in Jersey for the meantime. There are emotional decisions and business decisions. Only successful business people make business decisions. This decision was a cumulative result - brought on by not just one burden but dozens of them. New Jersey does not offer any business advantages – none!

 

The net result is that I will have an immediate 5% increase in workable money. In a little over a year, this will be triple to quadruple that value. Gone are also higher salaries that are needed to be paid - a negative COLA. I couldn’t promote the idea of moving out without researching it. Once doing so, all the pieces fell into place and the stars aligned. What I pay in turnpike tolls will be all but a memory. It’s time to go to Disney this summer!

 

I will continue to fight for my business bretheren who are in the same boat as me and help to promote the exodus from New Jersey.

 

 Thank heaven for PFL, State Debt and this stupid Toll Road scheme, they finally forced me to say “Enough is Enough”.

03/06/08 7:34 am

Business and the vapidity of conservative thinking


When it comes to supporting the New Jersey worker versus special interest groups, PoliticsSJ has no crises of conscience and instead considers the low-income worker who has to care for a sick family member or the new mother who wishes to spend a few weeks with her child to be completely expendable, with little or no rights. His belief that businesses should provide no rights to their workers -- health care be damned! -- is at odds with basic human rights issues and a general sense of fairness in the workplace.

If you're concern is the bottom line at a business (which is also a concern for me; but fairness towards workers and checks and balances are also necessary), then I would look to the UCLA economist projection that businesses actually save money in the long run with paid family leave because of worker retention and other factors. Your odd, bizarre claim that "business, and its internal policies, are of no concern for the government" represents the same type of naivete that discredited your first post when you asked why not make PFL mandatory (Enron: Regulate thyself, indeed). Do child labor laws, environmental standards, employee free choise acts with unions, and other such governmental interferences also fit into your economic model here?

Look at the facts, quit fearmongering, and you'll find that Paid Family Leave is relatively innocuous and disproportionately helps low-income workers and new mothers; and the employees, not the employers, pay into the plan with a new payroll tax. (I've tried to explain this to you via politickernj's private message system, but you're too afraid to reply).

03/06/08 7:52 am

Martin


First, I don't check nor do I know how to access the private contact, so don't even try.

In 1913, the federal income tax was relatively innocuous, too.  It was a 2% tax on the top 5% of all wage earners.  That's pretty much stayed the same, hasn't it?

When the bridges to Philly were built, the tolls were only supposed to last 10 years until the bonds were paid off.  Well, tolls keep going up. 

My point is, this will also be abused.  It will be funded, then politicians will look for ways to spend it and place IOUs into the account. 

And Martin, the only "fairness" a business owner owes an employee is a negotiated wage and benefits package, and that's all.  If the employee doesn't like it, get out and work somewhere else or start your own business.  If you don't like working for the man, BE the man. 

You treat businesses as the enemy and that's the problem.  You cited a California study that showed businesses that already had paid FSL stood to save.  That means some business owners saw teh value of FSL and retained good employees.  But the rest of the businesses should not be forced to follow suit.  Martin, your brand of socialism has not worked anywhere in the world.  But you cling to the hope that your brand of socialism just hasn't had the right people in charge.   

 

03/06/08 3:09 pm

Uh oh


http://www.njbiz.com/article.asp?aID=73576

A proposed amendment preventing employees of small business from sueing their employers if they do not have a job upon their return threatens to hold up the bill.   This would help protect small business and prevent anyone working for a small buisness from ever taking paid leave. 

I know that the general consenus is that people will abuse this program but I doubt it.  Trenton is going to make a killing off the surpus of unused funds from this program.    People value their jobs because that's what puts bread on the table.  A month and a half off entitlement doesn't help your sick family member if you don't have a job and can't feed them for the rest of the year.  If a company has a downsizing, they use that occasion to rid the company of any undesirables,  IE the slouches taking paid family leave.  OR the loud mouths that are hard to work with.

 I myself work over time on Sundays sometimes.    Taking  a month and a half off from your job would put anyone at great odds with your employer.  Can anyone on this board with a real job (martine and First AMend excluded) imagine themselves going up to their supervisor and telling them they're not going to be in for a month?

What sort of reaction would you expect to get from your employer? 

I don't care if business isn't paying for it... I'm more upset that I'll be paying for it out of my pay check, possibly into the hundreds of dollars years from now.  I want something for my 33 dollars.  When was the last time you bought nothing for 33 dollars? Martin?

03/07/08 1:38 am

Ah, That’s The Dilemma – Panama!


This program is not really out there to help the low-income employee or the ones who work for small business. No one really cares about them. This bill is really out there to serve the state's unions and other large union establishments – the big corporate non-union employees just happen to get a free ride due to their size. The small business employees would never be able to take advantage of this plan. It’s just a feel good type of clause so that ALL of the employees in this state would subsidize the larger company and union employees so that they could take their events, probably on a yearly basis.

 

It this were a serious bill, there would be much verification that would be required to take an event, not just a note from one’s podiatrist. Yes, your podiatrist can write you out for an event. And how ambiguous is the ‘Emotional Support’ clause? There is no real verification being performed. Also, I believe that the employee can take the State PFL and then the Federal Family Leave back to back. This would give 18 weeks of outage per event. Of course the Federal bill does require verification, but some union contracts skate around them.

 

 This whole bill is a sham. It’s written, not by hacks, but by extremely cunning people who know exactly how to write the proper loopholes in a measure. Yes, this bill was written as planned and passed as such. When you look at this bill, I mean really read an decipher this bill, it’s a total POS.

03/07/08 7:40 am

Disingenuous Martin


Well, there ya go Martin, I see you want to support this bill, and in doing so, support a core constituency of the Democrat party:  trial lawyers.

And the fact small businesses could get hit with lawsuit after lawsuit was nearly hidden.  Deception, deception, deception.

Also, we see that if more than 1 in 100 people utilize the fund, it will not be self-sustaining.  That means more taxes on businesses.  I guess we never thought about that, huh?

And what is the provision on "psychological comfort".  Are you kidding me?  Let's stay home with the kid for  a few weeks because the child was bullied at school. 

Oh, boy.

03/07/08 6:02 pm