This past week another voice calling for ethics reform was heard. The Prudential Business Ethics Center at Rutgers University released its report detailing the costs of corruption in New Jersey and outlined a number of proposals to reduce the level of corruption, and hence, its costs. This report voices concerns from a group, the business community, which is often dismissed as self-interested, but nonetheless has a tremendous impact on health and well-being of the state.
As a Fellow in this initiative, I know that the report is ambitious, and its ultimate aim is to change the political culture of the state. This political culture has long tolerated varying degrees of corruption among its political leaders. Systemic change of this magnitude is daunting and will require broad-based support among elected leaders and a fundamental attitudinal change among the people of New Jersey. This report is a first step in the process.
The report contains four categories of reform and argues that each must be taken together to achieve lasting change. The first calls for comprehensive campaign finance reform that will allow greater participation for ordinary citizens. The second recommends solutions to the ethical issues faced by the state that should be identified by a bipartisan commission. The third call for reforms in how government conducts its business. The fourth recommendation urges further research into the actual costs of corruption and the characteristics of those officials indicted or convicted of public corruption charges in recent years. Finally, when all else fails, the study recognizes the need for aggressive prosecution of law breakers.
Undoubtedly, many will disagree with specific recommendations that are contained in the report. (I'll explore some of the concerns I have in future columns.) However, these individual objections should not distract from the overall effort to address the problems that plague New Jersey.
You can obtain a copy of the report by visiting http://www.pruethics.rutgers.edu/.
Joe Ferriero's recent legal woes -- allegations that he assaulted a woman at a Labor Day barbecue at his home, and a federal probe of a grants ... >
There's something missing from the Republican Convention. There is a need for a camera behind the curtain where speakers greet ... >
Barack Obama offers a hard-left vision for America. He would take NJ's disastrous economic policies national, and the resulting economic ... >
Selecting the next NJN anchor will certainly be a different process than what happens at the major networks, local affiliates and other public ... >
Tibet – the broad, high plateau between India and China – is bigger than Western Europe and the source of the great rivers of Asia: the Indus, ... >
For the past few weeks, I've watched with fascination as politician after politician have appeared on a beach or a boardwalk and declared their ... >
To view a larger version of this cartoon, click here. >
Speaker Nancy Pelosi, on Meet the Press, made a statement that incurred the wrath of members of the Catholic bishops club. She dared to say that ... >
And now we go back in time, to Mr. Dembo's eighth grade science class and JHS 278, and a sixteen millimeter film about the seasonal migration of ... >
Report?
While I do not disagree with the reports purpose, or even its recomendations I have a problem with some of its tone. While it is worthwhile to listen to the business community, some of their comments on government and how we can fix it reflect their non-understanding of the venue of public policy. At times in the report, they seem to be simply name-calling and resorting to an anti-public sector bias that borders on mean-spiritedness. In not understanding the process of governance and discounting it based on some of its shortcomings they cannot offer meaningful solutions that can be taken seriously. Their recomendations seem constructed of whole cloth and tossed out of an angry hat, with no eye to how they could be practically implemented. Bottom line, is that the business community too often assumes that solving government's problems would be easy if only those governing had as fine a pedigree as their private sector counterparts. And that seems to be the tone of this report as well.
--Saint Joe--
"Tone"?
Ironically, "Saint Joe's" own post exemplifies the very objections he presents. His tone and lack of content or citations undermine his claims.
Raymond L. Bramucci, a former Ass't Secretary of Labor in the Clinton Administration, is the head of the Rutgers University Prudential Business Ethics Center which released the report. The report reflects the major findings of the New Jersey Business and Industry Association's annual business survey.
The results are consistent with findings of the non-partisan Tax Foundation which state that New Jersey has the nation's third-worst business climate, behind only Rhode Island and Ohio. (Bergen Record, Nov 29).
I have read the report's concerns and its recommendations. There is nothing ad hominem or tone deaf about them. And, in fact, there are any number of practical ways these concerns could be addressed and solutions implemented. Problem is, any change will radically threaten the fat business model of those who make a killing keeping the pay-to-play system as it is.
True, bleeding governments and businesses to benefit oneself and one’s cronies is a kind of expertise. But let’s not call it expertise in “governance” and “public policy.”
Reform can only be achieved by telling the truth about our shared human frailties and designing systems to more effectively neutralize them in the public interest.
Bodoc 14 "St Joe" 3
I haven't yet read the report and look forward to doing so; but sometimes "ya don't need a weatherman to know which way the wind blows".
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2-xIulyVsG8
BTW
Dr Marbach, If you haven't read it, you should get hold of Frances Fox Piven's "Why Americans Still Don't Vote".
If you have read it; you might want to try writing a piece that boils down the academic discussion into the terminology of realpolitic. (OR should we say "realpolitiker" ;-)
From Frederick Douglass
Ah, the all powerful Nick
Ah, the all powerful Nick Lento chimes in with his scoring system....Who do you think you are, Tony Realli? As for BoDoc The comments I suggested that were in a negative tone were quotes from the people surveyed, not Marbach. Even the Asbury Park Press, a business friendly paper, noted that most of the report's "evidence" was anecdotal and offered no pragmatic solutions
--Saint Joe--
What about my tax bill?
People are leaving because of high taxes, big government and the oblivious liberal idiots and insane people running our state. The only people who don't realize this are government employees and newspaper editorial writers.
A careful examination of this "study" is typical. Come up with a predetermined conclusion and then create a "survey" with loaded questions to back up the conclusion you want people to believe is true.
Professor, did any of your questions deal with high taxes?
For small business owners strugging to survive in this Marxist run economy on incomes a lot less than yours, there are other concerns besides whether some lawyer is buying a $500 ticket to a fundraiser.
It's pretty clear to everyone reading this website that the old axiom "those who can't do, teach", certainly applies to politics. If ethics were such a big issue, Doug Forrester would be Governor, Tom Kean would be Senator and Leonard Lance would be Senate President.
True ethics reform
If you want real ethics reform in this state, make corruption a capital crime, strap them down and give them the needle. Oh, wait, the crooks in Trenton want to make it life without parole now. That is were the government takes care of you for the rest of your life, something like the retirement benefits they get now.
Trust me, if you toasted (I still like the electric chair) a few of the criminals who betray our trust, the rest will straighten up real fast.
"The only man who never makes a mistake is the man who never does anything."
--Theodore Roosevelt--
From Frederick Douglass If
From Frederick Douglass
Seriously St Joe...
What is your "take" on the ethics of New Jersey's governance?
How would you address the problems of legalized corruption (assuming you think such problems exist). Educate me. I have a lot to learn and I admit it.
BODOC has done much good work and will do more in the years to come in the arena of reform. I suspect you/we could learn a lot from him.
Though I must say, I'm not pinning many hopes for change on reports issued by academics funded by Prudential.
It's going to take lots and lots of grass roots activism; nothing else will do the job. The Douglass quote below is always the bottom line when it comes to achieving any kind of just results.
From Frederick Douglass
Richard, While Death Might Seem....
.....an apprpriate penalty from a purely emotionallay reactive perspective; I have to say I'm opposed.
I do agree with you, however, in the sense that those who are convicted of the most egregious forms of public corruption, i.e. large scale/major betrayal of the public trust should suffer life imprisonment without parole in the general prison population; no club feds or cushy cells for "VIPs". These cretins are as dangerous to democracy as any terrorist who sets off a bomb.
Many many more deaths are caused by the sequeli of corruption in high places than by the relatively small number of crazed hate filled monsters who are clearly terrorists in the conventional sense.
If it became clear that their lives were in genuine peril; then a minimal accomodation could be made.
The people who commit these kinds of white collar/political crimes tend to be very calculating. If/when the penalties are draconian they will indeed be strongly motivated to "go straight". Deturrence will work better for this population/category than for any other.
Meanwhile, let's get about the business of making public corruption actually be criminal. As it stands now; clearly corrupt practices are 100& legal and these bums are laughing at us all the way to their offshore banks.
PS
To "Saint Joe" I'm far from "powerful" LOL. I'm just a nobody with no money and no connections.
If there is any power in anything I say; it's because other people might recognize the truth and be affected by it. It has nothing to do with me as a person.
MY own sense is that people do their best when motivated by their own Consciences. Unfortunately, there are too many people in office and in the private sector who are sociopaths and to whom appeals to Conscience will always fail. That's why we need strong laws with very sharp teeth.
From Frederick Douglass
True way to reform system
For the record, I DO think New Jersey has some major corruption issues, and as a homeowner, the "corruption tax" makes me very tired indeed. I hate paying high taxes so that others can suck from the trough and I don't have faith that this current Governor or Legislature can do a thing about it. However, I disagree with the "get tough" law and order solutions espoused on the posts above and the generic reforms proposed by people like the Pru Center. Reforms like banning dual office holding etc. are not a panacea. The way to find out what will work is to examine how government in NJ works from day to day. What are the temptations presented to lawmakers and why can't they resist. If you want to know why a politician is corrupt, don't ask a businessperson (who assumes all gvt employees are bad already anyway) ask the politician. Ask the bureacrat. What are there motivations for corrupt activity and do they even consider it corruption and what might make them stop? True solutions will come from a far more in-depth examination of NJs governmental system than the one offered by Pru.
--Saint Joe--